mad
Member
paulbear wrote:
You can only think that Hampshire have managed to win games because of their bowling because as a lot of Hampshire fans will tell you, their batting looks poor.
Over the hill? Missed their best shot at the title in yonks either side of COVID. The other county who might be described in this fashion we host next week. Yet they might beat odds on favourite Surrey today
Rushworth cracking bowler. Absent Jimmy and Broad being around all this time you'd have to think he'd have had some form of England recognition during the 2010's. Another is the chap we saw walk across the screen just before lunch Keith Barker
BristolBear wrote:
In a situation like this let’s be honest, if the bears have to bat again by bowling them out, Hampshire haven’t scored 300+. If they’re 3 or 4 down early, they’ll remove all risk, try take time out the game. So the awkward chase at the end is more likely to be a case of, do you have the overs left to score 60-70.
Whereas declaring overnight, means even if you bowl them out cheaply, you give Hampshire something to defend. So less brave, more stupid.
Yep you'd declare overnight if you wanted to dangle a tempter "Hampshire can still win" carrot. That wasn't a necessary strategy this morning.
Had it been very overcast and a low scoring game with 2 session left they might have pulled out at 130 ahead
Indeed get the runs beforehand so you don't need so many of them them later on. In this situation now there still could be a tricky little spell here for Hants before lunch and potentially a bit of a target for Bears to knock off after 5pm if their lower order can club their way to a score of 220 odd
Yes Rushy 0-1
Time is obviously not the issue in this situation there's 80+ overs left. If we need 90 overs to bowl these out they'll be well ahead by then anyway. The issue is because of the loss of a days play we only have a 2.3 runs per over lead to attack with. Not seen a lot of the game but hopefully a 180 lead on this pitch in these conditions is as daunting for the Hants batters as a 250 lead elsewhere
Pull out earlier and Hants might have been able to establish a 100+ lead before we skittle them
All ifs buts and maybes
There's no prospect of a second new ball as if that comes about they'll be well ahead. As a result of that you probably have to weigh up the options. Bat for 15/20 overs and get well ahead hopefully 250+ then pull out with 75 overs remaining would be my guess. Will want a mini session before lunch maybe 45 mins-1 hour but ideal to have weight of runs firstly.
Alternatively if the morning is overcast might be worth getting bowling first thing and then knock off any runs required by a chase after tea. Might be 150 to win though so could get tricky
Derby is traditionally hard and bouncy. Add that to Leicestershire batting order frailties and it did cloud over and went cool just as he came on first change. Even after it warmed up though he kept taking wickets. Shame as I'd liked to have seen a cameo of sorts by Rehan Ahmed.
Of note the scoreboard here is huge and that's terrific. Hopefully when Warks get around to replacing the pavilion end scoreboard it'll be similarly as good
He's been superb. Leics openers were so comfortable. It did cloud over and went cool for a bit just as Henry came on but superb to get the edge, then pin the next guy. Figures of 4-1 a few moments ago. He looked decent in the seconds game I saw couple of weeks ago v Somerset albeit a limited number of overs
Could this be the start of something for the lad? He's got all the attributes and still the right age to go on. Hopefully opens his mind to possibilities beyond the razzamatazz of hit and giggle formats
white-lightning wrote:
Norwell still injured? That's a big worry. Is it a back problem?
Yes it's a back problem. Different area of the back to his well documented back issue last season. Probability is he's only just back bowling again after fully resting. Possibility for Essex?
Bethell also a back problem out for a wee while yet probably won't be fit for start of the Blast
That's not particularly fair. Derbyshire are one of the 18 first class counties, and give Warwickshire a decent contest whenever we play them.
Craig Miles is a county championship winner who more than pulled his weight that season. Derbyshire like all counties will have bowlers of his style coming out of their ears. Brookes offers something different but doesn't yet have the proven pedigree in first class cricket of Milo. It's a bit of punt let's hope he does well
Honesty so important. The reason we've not had any yet maybe a legacy of previous ECB regime but also counties covering themselves hedging their bets.
Play offs ideas need discarding into the bin. They are just not suitable for long form cricket. Why should members at Leicestershire for example have to put up with their season finishing perhaps 2 or 3 weeks before the members of Surrey?
Scratch that he's just joined Derbyshire on loan for the next 2 championship rounds
Agree Woakes bowled well on day 2. Probably ought to have bowled first thing on the Saturday. I can't see Norwell being ready. That being the case if rotation is needed I think (bit risky) but a time for Henry Brookes to step up for either of OHD or Rushworth. Worth seeing what the Rose Bowl surface is like too. I doubt there'll be many surprises although Barker is out injured and if they've had a few days of sunshine down there it could be a harder bouncier wicket than we've played on during April so Brookes added height could be effective
What we now need from the ECB is a bit of honesty. What is the aim? All we seem to get when we question the county CEOs is "the counties all have differing priorities'. At forums last year we saw a few barbed comments (not necessarily from Warks but a few I saw online) about smaller counties and their place in the decision process.
If the priority is to shoehorn the CC between all the other formats then I'm sorry you can't expect folks to believe they seriously think equal home and away games (the integrity of the competition) is all that much of a priority.
If the priority is a thriving CC with integrity maintained then they'd go out of their way to ensure it was 2 divisions of 9+9, 16 fixtures with 2 up 2 down like it was between 2000 and 2016. A period of relative calm to which (despite some gripes re: lack of bank holiday/weekend fixtures/absence of local derbies/too much blocking some seasons) we'd benefit from returning to pretty darn quickly
These are questions the two Richards Gould and Thompson need to square. We are led to believe that the counties are more happy with the direction of travel and yet we keep being fed these stories like the Strauss grim reaper reappearing
Absolutely Paul.
A playoff situation will attract virtually no new fans - long form cricket is still long form cricket - all it does is aggravate the existing fans (current members, lapsed members and casual supporters alike) further who want their 8 county championship games back but have been made to settle for 7
Plus unless they schedule these play offs at the very beginning of September (not sure how they could and if they did what goes in the rest of September?) when there's a decent chance of weather kindly enough to make it a) a good contest and b) a good occasion; these play-offs will be like that Bob Willis Final at Lord's the other year finishing in October - an absolute farce.
How can you decide a county champion in such ridiculous circumstances?
Also part of the 'argument' for smaller divisions instead of one big 18 team league (or two 9's which worked blooming fine till they meddled with it) is it reduces the likelihood of dead rubber matches towards the end of the season. The trouble with play off's is it removes some (although by no means all) of the dead rubber matches from the end of the season and all of a sudden you have these fairly meaningless games at the beginning of the season instead.
No need for Surrey to get off to the rollicking start they have. Teams instead can just rock up with a few new signings in August, gatecrash the play-offs and win the County flipping Championship (FFS!!!) that way
Ruination
Well we know exactly which county clubs (and which one in particular ;-)) are spoon feeding certain sections of the media this claptrap don't we!
It's all part of the big media war between the empires for cricket's soul. Sky, Torygraph, Daily Mail, Cricinfo they're all compromised in some way. There'll be loads of this all summer. Maybe the 'sacking off' of Strauss was a bit of a decoy to throw everyone off the scent
Could really do with a summer without all this nonsense too. Just to be able to enjoy what's in front of us safe in the knowledge that it'll be more or less the same in 2-3 seasons if not the next 10. Constant flux over the past 6 seasons either side of Covid has been quite tiresome. Yes we had our gripes about the schedule during the 2000's and most of the 2010's but nothing like this crap we are forced to endure now
Any reduction of the County Championship has to be a joke unless they are all going to be scheduled in June, July and August. Even then I'm not biting. Just look at this season. We've chewed up 3 of our allotment of 14 games so far this season we've had games barely limping into the 3rd day of actual play. Extrapolate that across a season if there were only 10 games that's 2 days worthwhile play to watch per game, a family fortune of 20 days cricket (across a season that currently stretches over 180 days!!!) is your job lot with only 10 at home. 2/3 of those you're on holiday or at some wedding event which leaves you with 7 or 8 days cricket for your membership. They'd have to reduce membership to about £99 to justify the up front outlay. And that's for anyone who isn't still in employment.
This type of weather is not exactly unexpected in April and in fact can set in at any time during the summer, granted not every season but let's get real this could be the case for 2-3 years in a row before we get some golden summers again.
The One Day Cup in April sounds like a disaster waiting to happen to me. The better ODI players jetting off to IPL and other random comps or being rested for England duty. It'd end up like the Graham Williamson Trophy and get axed pretty soon after it was brought in.
Also after a long and dreary winter to then be told you have to wait until mid-May for proper red ball championship cricket to watch would be slightly galling.
Appointment to view is the way to go IMHO with a One Day Cup game or T20's bolted onto/sandwiched within each round of Championship cricket. 2 divisions of 9 and 16 rounds and away you go.
Surrey and Warwickshire probably the two most bloody-minded sides in Division One, both capable of soaking up considerable punishment yet still coming back for more. That is a measure of Surrey's achievement in breaking the game in such startling fashion. Surrey's sense of when to step up the tempo was an impressive feature of their second win in three.
Alec Stewart, their director of cricket, ably backed up by Batty and and skipper Rory Burns, have re-established the sort of Surrey dominance that was felt in the 1950s and again at the turn of the century. On and off the field, they are setting the standards. The Championship cannot be settled in April, especially by a side that has only won two matches in three, but it is already abundantly clear that they will take some stopping.
Think there is definitely lots of truth in Warks still being a developing side as Robinson re-asserted. Winning the title in 2021 was off the back of 5 or 6 games hanging on in there against decent sides E.g. Notts twice, Essex. Surrey are now a step above anything we faced in that title winning season (maybe Hampshire and Durham's bowling aside) but I fancy Lancs to take the game to them and you never know what Essex might be able to conjure up when they meet at Chelmsford next week.
As for Warks I do still think we have a good attack now. Was it a bad time to play Surrey as some suggested or would they be even more dominant in July with IPL lads back? I was intrigued by the pitch prepared for this game. Also some criticism of allowing Surrey's eighth wicket pair to get away but that's cricket. Might Rhodes have thrown the ball to Hassan and Woakes once OHD completed his over? Possibly. But had the extra pace mix of yorkers and shorter stuff gone wrong we'd all have been asking why Rhodes hadn't stuck with the line and length that seemed to work on Day 2 but clearly allowed Jamie Smith and Worrall to cut loose. The amount of time they had to play shots
And by the way I'm not necessarily tipping them for the title. County sides with a bit of game nous (maybe Lancs or Notts) might well unseat them. It's just Surrey of all the sides appear to have all bases covered and could very well be in that position for a long time.
Some pundits ludicrously predicted a decade of Yorkshire dominance 7 or 8 years back but that was backed by fairly flimsy evidence. Surrey in complete contrast could conceivably go onto dominate the county scene for a lengthy spell. They won't however as someone will have the game nous to unseat them.